Posted on March 19, 2010 by minneapolis mike

Last night I listened in on Keith “hey someone pay my way to the haj” Ellison’s phone town hall meeting.

He parroted all the Dem talking points, talked up the preliminary CBO scoring as if it was real, until later in the meeting when he had to admit it was a preliminary scoring of the bill. For the sake of “transparency”, you know.

To the Congressman’s credit, when I hopped into the queue to ask a question, his staffer didn’t disqualify my question out of hand.

Ellison represents MN CD5, which covers much of Minneapolis proper, and some first ring suburbs, like mine. So he is not operating in enemy territory, if you know what I mean.

He had some seminar callers who wanted to know when we might expect a move to a single-payer system.

He was quick to assure the callers who questioned the need to take such drastic action, that they could keep their current heathcare, skirting the truth that they will make it nearly impossible for your employers to keep providing insurance for you.

The one guy who brought up the blatant unconstitutionality of imposing a requirement to purchase a product from the Government was told that everybody needed to buy healthcare to keep the pool large to spread the cost over a larger group of people. He neither addressed the real question, nor offered any explanation of why it is constitutional.

There was a pretty fair mix of pro and con questions, so the Congressman’s staff is to be commended.

Although I was not afforded the chance to ask my question, you could leave a message at the end of the call.

My message was this:

If you vote for this clearly unconstitutional bill, I will work tirelessly to make sure you are not returned to Washington.

Take it to the bank.

Posted on February 26, 2010 by minneapolis mike

Consensus, defined by Webster

1 a : general agreement : unanimity <the consensus of their opinion, based on reports…from the border — John Hersey>

b : the judgment arrived at by most of those concerned <the consensus was to go ahead>

2 : group solidarity in sentiment and belief

Rightly or wrongly consensus seems to be an important thing here in the 21st century. With consensus you can scam the population of most of the developed countries on the planet into believing that somehow man is more powerful than the factors in the Universe that influence the Earth’s weather, like the Sun. This consensus proceeds from admitted falsified data that was used to “prove” a result that was pre-determined.

That “result”? That “man” (defined as being any white male of European descent, who has been successful in any way at raising the standard of living for a group of people above living in mud huts, and worshiping the Sun,  Gaia, or any number of liberal constructs that create guilt) has the power to make the Earth hotter, therefore damning the rest of the planet to bake in Hell for all Eternity. And creating the stage for a takeover of the world economy by a group of people (insert your favorite shadow conspiracy here) that could not care less whether Earth warms or not.

When these “scientists” were caught with their collective pants down, due to some still unknown operative spreading a substantial package of e-mails, data, and other goodies to the new media, the denizens of the internet, who spread that data far and wide. Their response was to double down, denying they falsified data, saying that only “peer reviewed” science (consensus) counted. They even brought out their Chief Useful Idiot, Algore, to proclaim that “the science is settled”.

It didn’t work. Since then, the house of cards has been crumbling, and there has been much new information about how many tentacles of the scam have been revealed, and how far they reach. They go to NASA, different universities, and into the governments of the USA and the UK. The UN has always been at the center of the scam from the beginning, and that is a world wide problem to be dealt with.

Here at home, Cap and Tax at least at this time seems to be dead. There is an end run coming from the EPA, who would have to claim powers they clearly don’t have in order to try and further the ball given to them by Beloved Leader, who at this point has been pretty much stymied in his attempts to get his agenda to kill the energy industry, and plunge the country into further disarray.

If these scams continue, and they no doubt will, continuing work will be required to keep us safe from those would would take your right to have a comfortable existence, and keep the fruits of your labor.

There will be more musings coming.

Posted on November 24, 2009 by minneapolis mike

Get this downloaded, and start searching through it.

From the Air Vent

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=75J4XO4T

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5171206

Distribute this EVERYWHERE!!!!!!

Posted on May 13, 2011 by Godwhacker

Posted on January 11, 2010 by Godwhacker

Go here and read it.

Here, let me run some quotes from the article:

“The bitter winter afflicting much of the Northern Hemisphere is only the start of a global trend towards cooler weather that is likely to last for 20 or 30 years, say some of the world’s most eminent climate scientists.”

“According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado, Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007 – and even the most committed global warming activists do not dispute this”

“But the effects are not confined to the Northern Hemisphere. Prof Anastasios Tsonis, head of the University of Wisconsin Atmospheric Sciences Group, has recently shown that these MDOs move together in a synchronised way across the globe, abruptly flipping the world’s climate from a ‘warm mode’ to a ‘cold mode’ and back again in 20 to 30-year cycles.

‘They amount to massive rearrangements in the dominant patterns of the weather,’ he said yesterday, ‘and their shifts explain all the major changes in world temperatures during the 20th and 21st Centuries.

‘We have such a change now and can therefore expect 20 or 30 years of cooler temperatures.’”

“Like Prof Latif, Prof Tsonis is not a climate change ‘denier’. There is, he said, a measure of additional ‘background’ warming due to human activity and greenhouse gases that runs across the MDO cycles.

But he added: ‘I do not believe in catastrophe theories. Man-made warming is balanced by the natural cycles, and I do not trust the computer models which state that if CO2 reaches a particular level then temperatures and sea levels will rise by a given amount.

These models cannot be trusted to predict the weather for a week, yet they are running them to give readings for 100 years.’”

“William Gray, emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Colorado State University, said that while he believed there had been some background rise caused by greenhouse gases, the computer models used by advocates of man-made warming had hugely exaggerated their effect.

According to Prof Gray, these distort the way the atmosphere works. ‘Most of the rise in temperature from the Seventies to the Nineties was natural,’ he said. ‘Very little was down to CO2 – in my view, as little as five to ten per cent.’”

“The longer the cold spell lasts, the harder it may be to persuade the public of that assertion.”

That being said. I would like to add my own little epilogue to the above story. Seeing how even an uneducated curmudgeon like myself saw through this from the beginning, I would like to say this:

YEAH!!!! EAT IT BITCHES, TAKE YOUR GAIA WORSHIPING, GRANOLA-EATING, VOLVO DRIVING, BIRKENSTOCK WEARING ASSES AND GO BACK TO WOODSTOCK, YOU FILTHY HIPPIES. I HOPE YOU ALL ROT IN HELL FOR TRYING TO GUILT US INTO BELIEVING YOUR RIGGED “SCIENCE”.

Whew, I feel better now.

Posted on October 21, 2010 by reactionaries